Plant-based building materials - a solution to climate crisis

05. June 2020 Sustainable Construction
Share

Buildings as carbon storage

Conventional buildings can have a massive carbon footprint because of the emissions that come from manufacturing building materials. But buildings can also act as carbon storage.

How can we build our way out of the climate crisis using plant-based materials like EcoCocon straw wall panels?

The principle is quite simple: plant-based materials like straw and wood capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through the process of photosynthesis. When used in construction, they store the CO2 safely inside the structure of the building.

While on average 1 m2 of our straw-wood panels only weighs 55 kg, it stores almost twice as much CO2! 97.6 kg to be exact. How is this even possible?

Every CO2 molecule is made up of one carbon and two oxygen atoms. During photosynthesis, a plant absorbs carbon and releases oxygen. Carbon has an atomic weight of 12, oxygen an atomic weight of 16, making up for an atomic weight of 44 for one molecule of CO2 (12 + 2x16). So while absorbing 44 kg of CO2 from the atmosphere, 12 kg of carbon remains in the plant and 32 kg of oxygen is released.

A typical hardwood tree absorbs 22 kg of CO2 per year. This means it will sequester approximately 880 kg of carbon dioxide by the time it reaches 40 years old. If we assume that an average family house has around 150 m2 of wall surface, then building it with EcoCocon can store as much CO2 as 17 trees over 40 years. (150 m2 * 97.6 kg of CO2 / 880 kg of CO2).


Why choice of materials matters

When we talk about the carbon footprint of buildings, there are two things we should consider - the operational emissions (energy used for heating/cooling) and the up-front embodied emissions (from extracting, manufacturing, and transporting building materials). 

To show the dynamics between the two, we can compare two seemingly identical family houses, both built to Passive House standard (ultra-low energy house). 

While the first house is built with classic materials such as bricks, concrete, and polystyrene insulation, the second makes the most of natural materials such as wood, cellulose, and clay.

The conclusions are fairly straightforward: If you build with natural materials, it is possible to actually store half the CO2 (35 tons) you would otherwise release using standard building materials (65 tons). That makes a difference of 100 tons of CO2 for just one building!

Although EcoCocon walls can be huge carbon storage, we do not consider our buildings to be carbon negative, but rather carbon neutral. At the end of their lifetime, the buildings will be deconstructed and the stored carbon will be eventually returned to the atmosphere. But consider this: an EcoCocon building built to Passive House standard emits only about 1 ton of CO2 due to heating and cooling a year (6 to 10 times less than a standard building). So it would take 65 years for the EcoCocon building to emit the same amount of carbon dioxide as a conventional building will have emitted BEFORE it is even used.

Why other walls just can't compare with EcoCocon

Apart from storing an immense amount of CO2, our panels have a very low carbon footprint from the production process. Our Environmental Product Declaration shows that only 2.48 kg of CO2 is emitted to produce 1 m2 of panels. 

When compared to other common wall types, the difference is staggering.

The choice is yours. Choose to be part of the solution. 


You should read next

Martha Lewis dangerous chemicals & building trade: It's very serious
06. December 2021

Martha Lewis dangerous chemicals & building trade: It's very serious

We interviewed Martha Lewis, senior architect and head of materials at Henning Larsen on the Feldballe Free School project we worked together on in Denmark. As winner of the 2019 Person Prize for outstanding commitment to sustainability, there are few better advocates for change within the architectural and construction industry. With the school project opening only weeks away, we found out why we should be concerned about the current situation in industry and what we can do to move towards much needed change: How a devastating set of chemicals is affecting health and fertility. What her research revealed about the amount of chemicals used in buildings. How current processes are allowing hazardous materials into our buildings. And her own research into chemical labelling and how we can be better informed.

Czytaj dalej